b'We continued to see expansive interpretation of the statute that may have an impact on future enforcement efforts, most notably relating to emails and travelto the U.S.JurisdictionWe continued to see expansive interpretation of the statute that may have an impact on future enforcement efforts, most notably relating to emails and travel to the U.S. For instance, as part of its global settlement, Airbus consented to the DOJs assertion of jurisdiction based on several minor territorial hooksnamely emails and travel to the U.S. The Airbus information asserts, [i]n furtherance of the corrupt bribery scheme, Airbus employees and agents, among other things, sent emails while in the United States and traveled to the United States. Similarly, in a ruling in the case of Coburn & Schwartz, former executives of a large technology company, the court found that individual emails could be considered separate units of prosecution. United States v. Coburn, No. 19-CR-00120-KM (D.N.J. Feb. 14, 2020). DOJ and SEC Updates on Enforcement Prioritiesand GuidanceIn addition to the updated version of A ResourceGuide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, U.S. regulators provided meaningful guidance on their interpretation of the FCPA, as well as their evalua-tion of corporate compliance programs, for instance, on June 1, 2020, the DOJ issued further updates to its 2019 guidance entitled Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs to DOJ prosecutors regarding the assessment of corporate compliance programs. And in December 2020, Acting Assistant Attorney General Brian C. Rabbit gave remarks emphasizing that FCPA enforcement is a top priority for the DOJ and that COVID-19-related disruptions will not deter the DOJ from aggressively investigating and prosecuting corruption matters in its pipeline.10'