Jerry Cedrone is an associate in the firm’s Litigation Department and a member of its Appellate Litigation practice. Mr. Cedrone’s work focuses on appellate matters and complex commercial litigation; he has experience in a range of areas, including administrative law, constitutional law, and patent litigation. Mr. Cedrone has argued before the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second and Ninth Circuits, and has drafted and contributed to briefs in numerous state and federal appellate courts, including two recent successful merits briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court. He has also authored and contributed to dispositive motions and other critical filings in trial courts throughout the country. Mr. Cedrone maintains an active pro bono practice, with recent experience in immigration law, criminal procedure, and First Amendment free-speech issues.

Before joining Goodwin in 2017, Mr. Cedrone clerked for Justice Elena Kagan of the U.S. Supreme Court and then-Judge Neil M. Gorsuch of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. He also served as a trial attorney with the Federal Programs Branch of the U.S. Department of Justice as a member of the Attorney General’s Honors Program. During law school, Mr. Cedrone was an executive editor of the Harvard Law Review, a finalist in the Ames Moot Court Competition, and a student volunteer with the Harvard Prison Legal Assistance Project.

Areas of Practice
Domaines D’Expertise





Mr. Cedrone’s recent matters include the following:

  • Co-authored prevailing merits briefs for the petitioner in Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 141 S. Ct. 1474 (2021), in which the Court limited the federal government’s ability to deny cancellation of removal to noncitizens.  In a 6–3 decision, the Court adopted the petitioner’s argument that the government must serve a “notice to appear”—the document that triggers deportation proceedings and restricts a noncitizen’s eligibility for cancellation—as a single document containing all the required information, rather than as a series of individual notices with separate pieces of information. 
  • Co-authored successful merits briefs for the petitioner in the U.S. Supreme Court in Banister v. Davis, 140 S. Ct. 1698 (2020), in which the Court preserved certain procedural rights for criminal defendants seeking a writ of habeas corpus. In a 7–2 decision, the Court held that a timely filed Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment in a federal habeas case is not an improper “second or successive” habeas petition.
  • Briefed and argued a successful immigration appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See Mendez v. Barr, 960 F.3d 80 (2020). The court reversed the Board of Immigration Appeals’ determination that misprision of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4 is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude.
  • Co-authored briefs successfully defending an antitrust class-action settlement in an appeal raising an issue of first impression regarding the authority of insurance claims administrators to opt customers out of class settlements. See In re Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation, 2020 WL 2146901 (2d Cir. 2020).
  • Co-authored briefs in the D.C. Circuit securing dismissal of a challenge to a shipping client’s eligibility to participate in the federal Maritime Security Program. See Matson Navigation Co. v. U.S. Department of Transportation, 895 F.3d 799 (2018).
  • Represented Braeburn in a successful lawsuit against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Co-authored summary-judgment briefing persuading the district court to vacate an exclusivity determination that blocked Braeburn’s new drug product BRIXADI™, a treatment for moderate to severe opioid use disorder, from receiving final approval. See Braeburn Inc. v. FDA, 389 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2019).


Mr. Cedrone was a 2021 recommended lawyer for Appellate by The Legal 500.

In The News









J.D., 2014
Harvard Law School
(magna cum laude)
A.B., 2011
Brown University
(magna cum laude)


2016 - 2017 U.S. Supreme Court, Honorable Elena Kagan
2014 - 2015 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, Honorable Neil M. Gorsuch



New York
New Jersey


U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Profile Image
Get In Touch
Our clients rely on us for world-class advisory services, counsel on complex transactional work and high-stakes litigation. Specializing in matters involving the financial, life sciences, private equity, real estate, and technology industries, we use a collaborative, cross-disciplinary approach to resolve our clients’ most challenging issues. To find out more, please contact us.


Nos équipes interviennent aux côtés de nos clients, industriels, fonds d’investissement, startups, institutions financières et dirigeants, dans le cadre de transactions et de contentieux complexes, et apportent des conseils de tout premier plan dans les secteurs financiers, des Sciences de la Vie, du Private Equity, de l’immobilier et des technologies. Nous traitons les dossiers juridiques de manière intègre, ingénieuse, souple et audacieuse pour répondre efficacement aux enjeux propres à chacun de nos clients, quels que soient la taille de l’opération et le secteur d’activité. Pour en savoir plus, contactez-nous.

Unsere Kunden verlassen sich auf unsere erstklassige Beratung, vor allem im Hinblick auf komplexe Transaktionen und High-Stakes-Prozesse. Spezialisiert auf Angelegenheiten der Finanz-, Life-Sciences-, Private-Equity-, Immobilien-und Technologie-Branchen, verwenden wir einen kooperativen und interdisziplinären Ansatz, um Fragen unserer Kunden auch in extremen Spezialsituationen einer Lösung zuzuführen. Sie wollen mehr erfahren? Kontaktieren Sie uns gerne.

Search Other Lawyers
Recherche par Pratique