Neel Chatterjee is a partner in Goodwin’s Intellectual Property practice. An internationally recognized technology litigator and trial lawyer, Mr. Chatterjee has a proven track record of wins in hard-to-win technology cases. His cases often break new ground in undefined areas of the law. Clients frequently turn to Mr. Chatterjee shortly before trial to handle complex technology cases. He is tireless in his efforts to save companies and product lines, as well as to protect core technologies of his clients. A key strategist on complex litigation spanning multiple venues, Mr. Chatterjee simplifies extremely complex concepts to ensure that the judges and juries understand the key issues in the case.

Mr. Chatterjee is committed to the community and engages in significant pro bono work. He has handled globally followed litigation involving civil rights issues for same sex couples, veterans’ rights, immigration rights and countless other issues.





Representative matters include:

Internet Liability Cases

  • Facebook v. ConnectU, et al. Lead counsel for Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg in several lawsuits involving claims under the CAN-SPAM act, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and related claims related to use of Facebook’s service for allegedly unauthorized purposes. Also acted as lead counsel in a separate proceeding where ConnectU (and ConnectU Founders) claimed to have created the idea for Facebook. Also represented Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg in a challenge to the settlement agreement.*
  • Facebook v. StudiVZ. Represented Facebook in a complex multinational dispute related to copying of Facebook’s graphical user interface.*
  • Facebook v. Guerbuez. Obtained a judgment of more than $850 million against an individual who used the Facebook website for improper purposes and sent false email messages to Facebook users.*
  • Facebook v. Lead counsel for Facebook on numerous claims against related to’s Internet Service that facilitates unauthorized access to Facebook and sent unsolicited messages to Facebook users.*
  • Miller v. Facebook. Represented Facebook in a copyright infringement action related to games made available through the Facebook platform.*
  • Microsoft Corp. v. RedOrbit. Represented Microsoft in a novel Internet case related to fraudulent online advertising practices coined as “click laundering.”*
  • Microsoft Corp. v. Holmes. Represented Microsoft against an international spam ring sending vast numbers of spam promoting adult content and fake pharmaceuticals.*
  • Microsoft Corp. v. John Does 1-27. Represented Microsoft in a novel first impression matter, pursued defendants under federal and state hacking, spam and computer abuse laws and obtained relief shutting down an approximately 400,000 computer botnet capable of sending more than 1.5 billion spam email messages per day.*
  • Claridge v. RockYou. Represented RockYou in a class action associated with an online data security breach.*
  • Butler, et al. v. Represented a same sex couple in a dispute with a company operating a website service related to adoption that refused to provide its services to the couple.*
  • Stoner v. eBay. Defended eBay against claims that the company was unlawfully selling, offering for sale, advertising for sale and causing the sale of illegal sound recordings in violation of three California Penal Code provisions. eBay successfully asserted that the Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. section 230, immunized eBay from liability from plaintiff’s claims.*
  • eBay v. Sheaffer. Obtained a preliminary injunction under California Penal Code section 502(c) related to unlawful trespass to eBay’s computer system.*
  • EMI, et al. v. VideoEgg, et al. Represented VideoEgg in a copyright infringement dispute related to sound recordings in music videos allegedly stored on a video hosting service.*

Patent Cases

  • Rambus, Inc. v. NVIDIA Corporation. Lead the defense of NVIDIA in a series of patent and antitrust disputes before the International Trade Commission, two Federal District Courts, a European Union proceeding, and seventeen reexamination proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. These disputes were related to products that use certain interfacing technologies required by industry standards.*
  • Nomadix v. iBahn, et al. Currently lead counsel for iBahn Corporation in a multi-patent, multi-defendant patent dispute related to hotel-based internet services.*
  • Scanner Technology v. KLA-Tencor and Nvidia Corporation. Currently lead counsel in numerous patent disputes against Scanner Technology involving semiconductor inspection technologies.*
  • CoreLogic Information Solutions, Inc. v. Fiserv, et al. Currently lead counsel for CoreLogic in a complex multi-defendant action related to automated property valuation technologies.*
  • Financial Systems Technology, PTY, et al. v. Oracle Corporation (pending). Defended Oracle in a two-patent dispute related to database technology.*
  • Fotomedia v. AOL LLC, et al. Represented AOL and Photobucket as lead counsel in several patent infringement disputes related to online photosharing technologies.*
  • Collaboration Properties, Inc. v. Tandberg, Inc., and Tandberg ASA. Represented Tandberg, Inc., and Tandberg ASA in several patent infringement disputes related to videoconferencing technologies.*
  • Hewlett-Packard v. EMC Corporation. Represented EMC Corporation in a 13-patent dispute with Hewlett-Packard. The case ultimately settled in a business deal estimated at $325 million in value to EMC Corporation.*
  • Network Caching Technology LLC. v. Inktomi Corporation. Defended Inktomi in a four-patent case brought by Network Caching Technology, Inc. Successfully narrowed the case and obtained rulings of first impression related to the Northern District of California Patent Local Rules.*
  • Papst Licensing Ltd. v. Quantum Corporation. Defended Quantum and Maxtor Corporation in a 10-year-long multi-district patent action, where the plaintiff accused Quantum of infringing 26 patents related to hard disk drive motor technology.*
  • Enterasys Networks v. Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. Currently representing Brocade in an ongoing multi-patent dispute related to computer networking technology.*

Trade Secret Cases

  • Quantum Corporation v. Imation Corporation. Represented Quantum and obtained a preliminary injunction against Imation based upon a claim of misappropriation of trade secrets. The injunction was obtained within 23 days of filing the complaint.*
  • KLA-Tencor v. Rigg, et. al. Defended Philip Rigg and Rigg Systems, Inc. against a preliminary injunction motion asserting a theory of “inevitable disclosure of trade secrets,” as well as other theories.*
  • RockYou, Inc. v. Blake Commagere. Litigated against a former consultant to RockYou in a dispute related to certain Facebook gaming applications and unauthorized access to data.*
  • Iconix Corp. v. NetPickle, et al. Represented NetPickle and its founders in a dispute related to the founding of RockYou wherein Iconix accused the founders of misappropriating technology.*

Technology Transactions Cases

  • Inxight, Inc., v. Verity, Inc. Litigated a series of cases on behalf of Inxight related to licensing of software between two companies. After Inxight prevailed at trial on one of the disputes, all of the disputes settled.*

* Denotes experience prior to joining Goodwin.

Professional Activities

Mr. Chatterjee serves or has served on the Board of Directors of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, the Magistrate Selection Committee for the Northern District of California, the Patent Local Rules Committee and the Federal Practice Program for the Northern District of California. He also founded the Bay Area Diversity Career Fair, one of the most successful diversity career fairs in the U.S. He is also an adviser to Asian Americans Advancing Justice and the National South Asian Bar Association.


Mr. Chatterjee has been recognized as a top IP litigator and trailblazer by Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal and the Daily Journal. Chambers USA has described him as being “singled out for his abilities acting for hi-tech companies in patent infringement claims,” with “the ability to think outside the box” as well as having “in depth knowledge of patent law.” Chambers Global recently recognized Mr. Chatterjee as being “sought-after” and “valued for his strategic approach to contentious matters and his strong courtroom advocacy.” Chambers Global further stated that his peers say “He is an outstanding lawyer who is beloved by his clients. He always puts in extra effort and really knows the law.” Most recently, IAM 1000 highlighted Mr. Chatterjee as someone who “gives terrific legal advice and has seen a lot of success in court,” also remarking that “he exudes friendliness and confidence, and has the right personality to remain at the top.” Mr. Chatterjee has also been recognized by Best Lawyers in the field of patent and intellectual property litigation.

In The News









J.D., 1994
Vanderbilt University
B.S., 1991
Dartmouth College


1995 - 1997 U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Honorable Patricia V. Trumbull
1994 - 1995 Colorado Supreme Court, Honorable Mary Mullarkey, Chief Justice





U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Get In Touch
German Translation
Our clients rely on us for world-class advisory services, counsel on complex transactional work and high-stakes litigation. Specializing in matters involving the financial, life sciences, private equity, real estate, and technology industries, we use a collaborative, cross-disciplinary approach to resolve our clients’ most challenging issues. To find out more, please contact us.
Unsere Kunden verlassen sich auf uns für erstklassige Beratungsdienste, beraten über komplexe Transaktionsarbeiten und High-Stakes-Prozesse. Spezialisiert auf Angelegenheiten der Finanz-, Life-Sciences-, Private-Equity-, Immobilien-und Technologie-Industrie, verwenden wir eine kooperative, interdisziplinäre Ansatz zur Lösung unserer Kunden am schwierigsten Fragen. Um mehr zu erfahren, kontaktieren Sie uns bitte.

Nos équipes interviennent aux côtés de nos clients, industriels, fonds d’investissement, startups, institutions financières et dirigeants, dans le cadre de transactions et de contentieux complexes, et apportent des conseils de tout premier plan dans les secteurs financiers, des Sciences de la Vie, du Private Equity, de l’immobilier et des technologies. Nous traitons les dossiers juridiques de manière intègre, ingénieuse, souple et audacieuse pour répondre efficacement aux enjeux propres à chacun de nos clients, quels que soient la taille de l’opération et le secteur d’activité. Pour en savoir plus, contactez-nous.


Search Other Lawyers
Recherche par Pratique