For over 25 years, Mr. Daukas has successfully represented a range of clients in complex litigation involving government and private entities. Such matters include product liability and complicated business litigation, such as post-closing disputes, breach of contract actions, torts and investigations.
- Represented financial institutions in state investigations and class action disputes.
- Represented private equity and venture capital institutions in a variety of litigation including post-closing disputes and client counseling.
- Represented one of the largest U.S. financial institutions in mortgage backed securities litigation involving governmental and private entities, and class action consumer finance litigation.
- Successfully represented parties in “business divorces,” including arbitrations and court proceedings for private equity and venture capital clients and their portfolio companies, and principals in various industries.
- Successfully represented an entrepreneur in a $60 million post-closing dispute involving one of the most successful seafood processing and marketing businesses in the country.
- Successfully represented Waste Management, Inc. in a $60 million dollar property tax appeal against the City of Bridgeport, CT – in which after trying the matter he argued and won a far-reaching decision concerning governmental misconduct in the Connecticut Supreme Court. Wheelabrator v. City of Bridgeport, 133 A.3d 402 (2016) . In 2010, won a two-week arbitration for Waste Management involving complicated operating and accounting issues and claims of over $100 million in a decades-old unfair trade practices dispute. Zielinski v. Connecticut Valley Sanitary Waste Disposal, Inc., C.A. No. 10-3850 (Massachusetts Superior Court). Argued a companion appeal before the Massachusetts Court of Appeals. Zielinski v. Connecticut Valley, 70 Mass. App. Ct. 326 (2007).
- Represented a prominent waste management and environmental services company in challenges to operation of waste-to-energy facilities
- Represented a Fortune 50 investment company in a one-week arbitration concerning alleged breach of fiduciary duty in the investment fund context, and a Fortune 500 company in a bankruptcy court trial involving valuation of the W Boston Hotel and residence.
- Won a two-week arbitration for Wheelabrator Technologies, Inc. against the State of Connecticut involving financing and operation of a $225 million waste-to-energy facility.
- Represented a Fortune 50 company in SEC investigations involving derivatives and complicated accounting issues.
- Won summary judgment in a products liability action for an engineered membrane manufacturer in the U.S. District Court for Utah. Coverstar v. Cooley, 2006 WL 1579620 (D. Utah 2006).
- Represented one of the nation’s leading cigarette manufacturers in over 80 smoking and health and other product liability cases in numerous federal and state courts. In 2001, he successfully tried the first tobacco case to go to jury verdict in New England in a decade – a three-week jury trial in the U.S. District Court for Rhode Island: Hyde v. Philip Morris, Incorporated, C.A. No. 97-359ML, slip op. (D.R.I. May 21, 2000). In 2003, won a seven-week jury trial in New Hampshire: Longden v. Philip Morris, Incorporated.
- Successfully argued numerous dispositive motions on behalf of the cigarette industry. See, e.g., Penniston v. Philip Morris, 2000 WL 1585609 (D. Mass. 2000); Varney v. R.J. Reynolds, 118 F. Supp. 2d 63 (D. Mass. 2000); Nicolo v. Philip Morris, 37 F. Supp. 2d 121 (D.R.I. 1999), reversed, 201 F.3d 29 (1st Cir. 2000), dismissed on remand; Perrelli v. Philip Morris, C.A. No. 3:99CV01871 SRU, slip op. (D. Conn. 2000). In total, he has been instrumental in disposing of over 80 smoking and health and fire safe cigarette cases.
- In addition, Mr. Daukas’ complex business litigation experience includes:
- the successful representation of a Fortune 50 healthcare company in a complex business arbitration spanning 84 days of hearings in which he proved fraud and obtained an award of multiple damages and attorneys’ fees
- recovering a $5 million award for a marine engine and generator manufacturer in a 32-day international arbitration against an affiliate of Toyota Corporation. Westerbeke Corporation v. Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd., 304 F.3d 200 (2nd Cir. 2002)
- representing a leading computer manufacturer in litigation instituted by its distributors. dB Sales, Inc. v. Digital Equipment Corp., 125 F.3d 855 (6th Cir. 1997), and Trent Partners v. Digital Equipment Corp., 120 F. Supp. 2d 84 (D. Mass. 1999)
- defending major corporations in environmental litigation in New York, Massachusetts, Maine and Connecticut
- serving as trial counsel in bankruptcy litigation resulting in a $70 million victory. In re: Armada Realty Group, Ltd., C.A. 96-40356 JFQ (B.R. Mass. 1997)
- Defended public companies in securities fraud and corporate governance class actions. He has represented clients in government investigations involving the SEC, Department of Defense, Department of Transportation, State Banking Commissioners, State Fire Marshall, and FDIC. E.g. F.D.I.C. v. Raffa, 935 F. Supp. 119 (D. Conn. 1995).
Mr. Daukas is a member of the Massachusetts Bar Association, the Rhode Island Bar Association and the Boston Bar Association.
He is a past president of the Dartmouth College Alumni Council, a board member of The Dover Foundation Scholarship Fund, a Boy Scout volunteer, and an active volunteer of Most Precious Blood Parish.
Mr. Daukas served on the Goodwin pro bono team responsible for forming and securing charitable status for The One Fund, created to provide financial assistance to survivors and families of those killed in the Boston Marathon bombings.
For the past seven years, Mr. Daukas has participated with Team Goodwin in the Pan-Mass Challenge, a marathon bicycle ride across Massachusetts that raises money for cancer research and is the largest athletic fundraising event in the world.
In addition, he has served on Goodwin’s Hiring and Associate Review Committees.
Mr. Daukas served as a special assistant district attorney for Middlesex County (MA), where he prosecuted a variety of misdemeanor and felony cases and argued numerous dispositive and evidentiary motions.