Ron Pabis is a partner in Goodwin’s IP Litigation practice. Mr. Pabis is an experienced trial lawyer who represents technology companies in patent litigation and patent licensing disputes. He has litigated patent cases for more than a decade in the networking, semiconductor, semiconductor packaging, software, and medical device fields. Mr. Pabis leads trial teams at all stages of the litigation process, including pre-suit disputes and negotiations, Markman and summary judgment hearings, and at trial.

As part of his patent litigation practice, Mr. Pabis regularly represents companies in United States District courts throughout the country and in Section 337 cases before the U.S. International Trade Commission. He has also tried a number of matters before arbitration panels including panels before the International Chamber of Commerce and has appeared before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in inter partes review proceedings.

Prior to joining Goodwin in 2018, Mr. Pabis was a partner at Greenberg Traurig.

Areas of Practice
TÄTIGKEITSFELDER
Domaines D’Expertise
业务范围

Experience

ERFAHRUNG

EXPÉRIENCE

工作经历

Mr. Pabis’ representative experience includes:

International Trade Commission

  • Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-1002: Counsel in Section 337 investigation related to alloy and steel products from China.*
  • Certain Height-Adjustable Desk Platforms and Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-992: Counsel in Section 337 investigation related to height-adjustable desk platforms.*
  • Certain Digital Televisions Containing Integrated Circuit Devices, 337-TA-806. Counsel for Renesas and 511 Technologies, Inc. in ITC investigation seeking exclusion of Vizio's digital televisions.*
  • Certain Digital Televisions, 337-TA-789. Counsel for Renesas Electronics Corporation and Renesas Electronics America, Inc. in ITC investigation regarding QAM demodulation.*
  • Certain Digital Cameras, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-671. Trial counsel for Samsung Electronics, Ltd. in patent-based section 337 investigation regarding patents related to digital camera technology against Eastman Kodak, Inc.*
  • Certain Voltage Regulators, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-564. Trial counsel for complainant Linear Technology in 337 investigation regarding analog circuitry. Commission issued exclusion order after finding violation. Additionally, acted as trial counsel in enforcement proceeding to enforce the limited exclusion order.*
  • Certain Systems for Detecting and Removing Viruses or Worms, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-510. Counsel in enforcement proceeding for complainant Trend Micro. Settled in enforcement phase after finding of violation and grant of partial summary judgment of violation of cease and desist order.*
  • AATI v. U.S.I.T.C. Acted as counsel for intervener Linear Technology in appeal to Federal Circuit.*

District Court

  • DynavairLLC v. Linear Technology, Inc., Counsel for Linear in patent infringement case in the Eastern District of Texas related to battery cell balancing technology. Secured dismissal with prejudice.*
  • Prisua Engineering Corp. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Counsel for Samsung in patent infringement case in the Southern District of Florida relating to video substitution.*
  • Signal IP v. Kia Motors America, Inc., Counsel for Kia Motors in a five patent case in the Central District of California relating to alleged infringement of patents relating to hybrid vehicles, occupant classification and blind spot detection systems. Court granted summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of Kia.*
  • Voxathon v. Hyundai Motors, America, Inc., Counsel for Hyundai in patent infringement action relating to automotive entertainment systems. Court granted motion to dismiss on Section 101 grounds.*
  • Raytheon Corporation v. Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. Counsel for Samsung in patent infringement case in the Eastern District of Texas relating to the process for manufacturing microelectronic devices. Court stayed case pending resolution of IPR.*
  • Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Counsel for Samsung in case in Eastern District of Texas relating to communication systems.*
  • Tessera, Inc. v. Amkor Technology, Inc. Counsel for Amkor technology in case in dispute relating to semiconductor packaging technology.*
  • Tessera, Inc. v. Renesas Electronics Corporation. Counsel for Renesas Electronics Corporation in a patent infringement action in District of Delaware regarding semiconductor packaging.*
  • Invensas Corporation v. Renesas Electronics Corporation. Counsel for Renesas Electronics Corporation in a patent infringement action in District of Delaware regarding semiconductor packaging.*
  • Linear Technology v. Monolithic Power Systems. Trial counsel for plaintiff Linear Technology in jury trial relating to analog circuitry, which ended with a jury verdict of infringement.*
  • Fenner Investments v. Dell, Inc. Counsel for Dell in patent infringement lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas involving routers, IP packets bridges and related technologies, which was settled before trial.*
  • Hitachi Global Storage Technologies v. G.S.Magic. Acted as counsel for HGST case that settled before trial in the in Northern District of California.*
  • Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. v. Michelson. Trial counsel in three-month patent jury trial regarding spinal implant technology in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee.*
  • Research Corporation Technologies v. Lexmark Int'l. Acted as counsel for Research Corporation Technologies in six-patent case regarding printer software technology. Case was settled following summary judgment and Markman rulings.*
  • Arbitrated dispute between medical device manufacturers in a nine-day hearing regarding the parties’ rights under a patent license agreement. Received arbitration award favorable to the client after hearing.*
  • Counsel for hard disk drive manufacturer in nine patent case regarding storage technology in Eastern District of Texas.*

Patent Trial and Appeal Board

  • Amkor Technology, Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., IPR2013-00242. Counsel for Amkor technology in case relating to semiconductor packaging technology.*
  • Kia Motors America, Inc. v. Signal IP, Case IPR2016-00115 and joinder case IPR2015-01004. Counsel for Kia Motors in inter partes review proceeding relating to hybrid vehicles, occupant classification and blind spot detection systems.*
  • Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. v. Raytheon Company, Case IPR2016-00739 and IPR2016-00962. Counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. in inter partes review proceeding relating to the process of manufacturing a microelectronic device using a removable support substrate and etch-stop.*
  • Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC, Cases IPR2015-01724, IPR2015-01725, IPR2015-01726, and IPR2015-01727. Counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in inter partes review proceeding relating to a nationwide communication system. Case settled after institution.*
  • SK Hynix Inc., SK Hynix America Inc., SK Hynix memory solutions Inc., and Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America Inc. v. DSS Technology Management, Case IPR2016-00192. Counsel for SK Hynix Inc., SK Hynix America Inc., SK Hynix memory solutions Inc., and Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America Inc. in inter partes review proceeding relating to semiconductor structure having reduced lateral plug erosion.*

* Denotes experience prior to joining Goodwin.

Recognition

  • Managing IP Magazine's World IP Handbook and Survey, “IP Stars,” 2014-2018
  • Super Lawyers magazine, Washington, D.C. Super Lawyers, 2015-2018
  • IAM magazine, “IAM Patent 1000,” Litigation, 2014-2017

In The News

MELDUNGEN

ACTUALITÉS

在新闻中

Credentials

WERDEGANG

RÉFÉRENCES

专业资格

Education

J.D., 1994
Albany Law School
B.S., 1988
Hobart and William Smith Colleges

Admissions

Bar

District of Columbia
Florida

Courts

U.S. Bankruptcy Court of District of Columbia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Get In Touch
German Translation
NOUS CONTACTER
联系我们
Our clients rely on us for world-class advisory services, counsel on complex transactional work and high-stakes litigation. Specializing in matters involving the financial, life sciences, private equity, real estate, and technology industries, we use a collaborative, cross-disciplinary approach to resolve our clients’ most challenging issues. To find out more, please contact us.
Unsere Kunden verlassen sich auf uns für erstklassige Beratungsdienste, beraten über komplexe Transaktionsarbeiten und High-Stakes-Prozesse. Spezialisiert auf Angelegenheiten der Finanz-, Life-Sciences-, Private-Equity-, Immobilien-und Technologie-Industrie, verwenden wir eine kooperative, interdisziplinäre Ansatz zur Lösung unserer Kunden am schwierigsten Fragen. Um mehr zu erfahren, kontaktieren Sie uns bitte.

Nos équipes interviennent aux côtés de nos clients, industriels, fonds d’investissement, startups, institutions financières et dirigeants, dans le cadre de transactions et de contentieux complexes, et apportent des conseils de tout premier plan dans les secteurs financiers, des Sciences de la Vie, du Private Equity, de l’immobilier et des technologies. Nous traitons les dossiers juridiques de manière intègre, ingénieuse, souple et audacieuse pour répondre efficacement aux enjeux propres à chacun de nos clients, quels que soient la taille de l’opération et le secteur d’activité. Pour en savoir plus, contactez-nous.

客户信赖我们世界一流的咨询服务,希望获得针对复杂事务性工作与高风险诉讼的建议。我们通过协作式、跨领域的工作方法来解决客户最棘手的问题,涵盖金融、生命科学、私募股权、不动产和技术等多个行业。如需更多信息,请与我们联系。

Search Other Lawyers
ANWALTSSUCHE
Recherche par Pratique
搜寻其他律师