0FINRA Proposes Amendment to Rule 5122 on Member Private Offerings to Expand Application to Private Offerings by Unaffiliated Issuers
On January 11, 2011, FINRA published a regulatory notice, FRN 11-04, requesting comment on proposed amendments to Rule 5122, currently entitled “Private Placements of Securities Issued by Members.” The rule would be amended to apply to all private offerings in which a FINRA member firm participates. With one exception, the exemptions now available under the rule would be available under the amended rule. The exemption for an offering by a control person of a member acting solely in a wholesaling capacity would be deleted.
Rule 5122 has three basic requirements:
The member firm must provide a disclosure document or term sheet to each prospective investor disclosing the intended use of proceeds, the offering expenses and compensation to be paid to participating broker-dealers;
The disclosure document must be filed with the FINRA Corporate Financing Department within ten days after first use; and
No more than 15% of the offering proceeds may be used to pay offering expenses and commissions, with the remainder to be used for the business purposes disclosed in the offering material.
FINRA proposes to amend the rule to require that the offering material also disclose, if applicable, the nature of any affiliation between the issuer and any participating broker‑dealer. The definition of “affiliate” in Rule 5122 would adopt the definition of “control” as used in Rule 5121 (Public Offerings of Securities with Conflicts of Interest). That definition is much broader than the definition of “control” currently used in Rule 5122 or elsewhere, and includes beneficial ownership by one person of 10% or more of the outstanding common equity, preferred equity or subordinated debt of another person.
Comments on this proposal are due by March 14, 2011. If FINRA decides to go forward with the rule amendment, its next step will be to make a rule filing with the SEC, at which time there will be a second opportunity to comment.
0Banking Industry Criticizes FinCEN’s Proposed Rules Broadening Reporting Obligations for Cross-Border Electronic Transmittals of Funds
The banking industry has been sharply critical of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s (“FinCEN”) proposed rules (the “Proposed Rules”) to broaden the reporting obligations of banks and money transmitters for cross-border electronic transmittals of funds (“CBETFs”). Comment letters from the industry have attacked the proposal on various grounds, including that the Proposed Rules are overbroad and that FinCEN is not technologically prepared to utilize the data which would be provided by banks under the Proposed Rules.
Under the Proposed Rules, which were described in the October 5, 2010 Alert, certain banks would be required to furnish FinCEN with (1) copies of transmittal orders or advices (or equivalent information in a format to be developed by FinCEN) for CBETFs sent to or received from foreign financial institutions and (2) an annual report that provides the account numbers for accounts that transmitted or received a CBETF and the U.S. taxpayer identification numbers for the corresponding accountholders. The Proposed Rules would also require certain money transmitters to submit reports regarding CBETFs of $1,000 or more sent to or received from foreign financial institutions.
The banking industry’s main criticism of the Proposed Rules is that requirements for annual reporting of taxpayer identification information for accountholders engaged in cross-border electronic transfers are an unnecessary invasion of privacy that would not collect useful information. In addition, the industry commented that the Proposed Rules would require banks to submit a large volume of reports, but that the information would not provide FinCEN with more meaningful data than it could collect through more limited reporting requirements. Industry commenters also pointed to the fact that FinCEN exceeds current FinCEN data management capabilities and fails to impose adequate standards on law enforcement for data use accountability or security. Other commenters stated their views that the Proposed Rules exceed the limited rulemaking authority provided to FinCEN by Congress in Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 by imposing overly broad reporting requirements. The Alert will continue to monitor developments regarding the Proposed Rules.
0FDIC Approves Final Rule that Would Extend Unlimited FDIC Insurance Coverage to IOLTAs from December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2012
- NewslettersFebruary 22, 2024
FTC Provides Annual Letter to CFPB On 2023 Equal Credit Opportunity Act Activities
- NewslettersFebruary 8, 2024
Federal Bank Regulatory Agencies Seek Comment on Interagency Effort to Reduce Regulatory Burden
- NewslettersFebruary 1, 2024
Federal Reserve Announces the Bank Term Funding Program will Cease Making New Loans as Scheduled on March 11
- NewslettersJanuary 25, 2024
Federal Reserve Announces it Will Extend the Comment Period on its Interchange Fee Proposal Until May 12, 2024
- NewslettersJanuary 19, 2024
CFPB Proposes Rule to Close Bank Overdraft Loophole
- NewslettersJanuary 11, 2024
CFPB Report Identifies Challenges Faced by Borrowers in Resumption of Student Loan Payments
- NewslettersDecember 14, 2023
OCC Report Identifies Key Risks Facing Federal Banking System
- NewslettersDecember 7, 2023
OCC Issues Guidance on Risk Management of “Buy Now, Pay Later” Lending
- Awards and RankingsFebruary 20, 2024
Chambers Global 2024 Recognizes Goodwin Lawyers and Practices as Worldwide Leaders
- Press ReleaseDecember 14, 2023
Goodwin Advises on Two Announced Bank Mergers of Equals
- Awards and RankingsNovember 2, 2023
Best Lawyers Best Law Firms 2024 Names Goodwin Law Firm of the Year for Leveraged Buyouts and Private Equity Law and Recognizes 54 Practice Areas
- Speaking EngagementsNovember 1, 2023
SIFMA Market Structure Conference
- In the PressOctober 20, 2023
Proactive Measures While NY Foreclosure Law Is In Limbo (Law360)
- Awards and RankingsOctober 19, 2023
Chambers UK 2024 Highly Ranks Goodwin Lawyers and Practices in London and Cambridge
- In the PressOctober 3, 2023
Fintech-Bank Partnerships: Allocating Risks and Rewards (Practical Law The Journal)
- Awards and RankingsOctober 2, 2023
IFLR1000 Recognizes 72 Goodwin Lawyers and 22 Practices in its 2023 Financial and Corporate Law Rankings