Jeremy Jones

Jeremy Jones is an associate in Goodwin’s Intellectual Property Litigation practice. Jeremy represents technology companies in patent litigation and post-grant proceedings, with experience spanning federal district courts, inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), and investigations before the International Trade Commission (ITC). His recent work includes matters involving semiconductor technology, mobile devices, and consumer electronics.

Prior to joining Goodwin, Jeremy served as a Patent Examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, where he examined patents related to metallurgy and additive manufacturing, providing him with a strong technical foundation in complex engineering and manufacturing technologies.

Member of Intellectual Property Owners Association

Prior to joining Goodwin, Jeremy worked as a Patent Examiner at the USPTO for seven years. He also served as an intern to Judge Paul Friedman in the District Court for the District of Columbia in 2022.

Jeremy has experience supporting clients in patent litigation and post-grant proceedings across a range of technologies, including semiconductor manufacturing, mobile devices, telematics systems, and consumer electronics. His work includes:

• Assisting in patent litigation matters involving semiconductor and electronics technologies in federal district courts and before the ITC
• Supporting inter partes review proceedings before the PTAB involving mobile device and hardware-related patents
• Working on patent enforcement proceedings involving wearable and consumer wellness technologies
• Assisting clients in disputes involving automotive and telematics technologies
• Supporting discovery, motion practice, and pretrial strategy in complex intellectual property disputes
• Maintaining an active pro bono practice, including immigration, voting rights, and civil justice initiatives

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE

• Represented an international electronics manufacturer in an ITC dispute regarding electronic displays, where all claims were found invalid or not infringed
• Represented an international OEM in litigation regarding standard essential patents, resolving the dispute favorably
• Represented a software company in a dispute involving claims and counterclaims of patent infringement and breach of contract, resolving the dispute favorably for the client
• Represented a life sciences company in a patent infringement dispute regarding nasal irrigation devices, reaching a successful outcome