0Massachusetts Department of Revenue Issues Guidance on Imputed Income for Coverage of Non-Tax Dependents
As discussed in the August 2007 Employee Benefits Update, beginning January 1, 2007, the Mass Health Law requires all insured health contracts providing dependent coverage to extend coverage to individuals through the earlier of their 26th birthday or two years following loss of dependent status (the “Extended Coverage”). For this purpose, loss of dependent status occurs on December 31 of the last federal tax year for which the individual is claimed as a dependent on the employee’s federal tax return. Many insurers and employers held special open enrollment periods to accommodate this extension of coverage in 2007. In addition, in some cases employers with self-insured health plans voluntarily added Extended Coverage.
Also as discussed in the August 2007 Employee Benefits Update, if the Extended Coverage is provided to a child who both (1) cannot be claimed as a dependent on the employee’s federal income tax return and (2) receives less than half of his support for the calendar year from the employee, additional amounts must be reported on the employee’s Form W-2 as taxable wages for federal and Massachusetts income tax purposes and are subject to withholding and employment taxes. The amount of such additional taxable wages is equal to the fair market value of the child’s coverage to the extent that it exceeds any amount paid by the employee for such coverage on an after-tax basis.
In late November 2007 the Massachusetts legislature passed a technical correction bill providing that the value of Extended Coverage mandated by law is NOT taxable wages for Massachusetts state income tax purposes. This change is effective January 1, 2007. Thus, Extended Coverage may result in additional reportable wages only for federal income tax purposes.
In addition, at the end of December 2007 the Massachusetts Department of Revenue issued a technical information release explaining that there are no reportable wages attributable to the value of Extended Coverage for personal Massachusetts income tax purposes (and thus an employee’s Massachusetts wages for the year, as reflected on his Form W-2, will be lower than his federal wages). Technical Information Release 07-16 provides examples and can be accessed at www.mass.gov using the search term tir 07-16. The TIR interprets the technical correction enacted by the Massachusetts legislature as also applying to a self-insured plan that voluntarily provides Extended Coverage.
For 2007 and subsequent years, employers must identify which employees are receiving Extended Coverage and obtain from them the information needed to determine whether the value of such Extended Coverage must be reported as taxable federal wages on Form W-2 and included in employment tax calculations. Employers should also take steps to determine how they will administer deductions for wage withholding and the employee portion of employment taxes if the value of Extended Coverage is required to be included in taxable federal wages. The value of Extended Coverage is determined in the same manner as is done currently for coverage provided to non-tax dependent same-sex spouses or domestic partners. In addition, employers will need to explain to affected employees why they have taxable wages due to Extended Coverage.If you would like additional information on determining the amount of such Extended Coverage includible in taxable wages, identifying employees subject to Extended Coverage taxable wage reporting, or what information is needed from employees to make such identification, please contact a member of the Employee Benefits Practice Area listed below.
0Forms 1099-HC Must be Issued by January 31, 2008
- AlertMarch 3, 2023
Part III: What Primary Mitigation Strategies Exist for Companies with Double-Vest RSUs That May Be Expiring?
- AlertFebruary 23, 2023
Part II: Why Do Private Companies Shift From Stock Options to Double-Vest RSUs?
- AlertFebruary 16, 2023
Part I: What are “Double-Vest” RSUs and Why Are They Making Headlines?
- AlertJanuary 10, 2023
Deadline Approaching for Reporting 2022 ISO Exercises and ESPP Transfers
- Goodwin InsightsJanuary 5, 2023
ERISA Litigation Update
- AlertJanuary 3, 2023
Department of Labor Finalizes Amendments to Investment Duties Regulation
- Goodwin InsightsDecember 20, 2022
Key Compensation Considerations for Public Companies in a Market Downturn
- AlertOctober 11, 2022
Benefit Plan Considerations for Employers in a Market Downturn
- Press ReleaseMarch 24, 2023
Berkshire Grey Enters Into Definitive Merger Agreement with SoftBank Group
- In the PressMarch 3, 2023
No Easy Way Out: Stripe's $4 Billion Share Rescue Too Pricey for Other Startups? (PitchBook)
- In the PressFebruary 16, 2023
Tech Start-Ups Face Dilemma Over Expiring Staff Share Awards (Financial Times)
- Speaking EngagementsFebruary 7, 2023
MMA's Leaders in Life Science Networking Event: Retirement Plan Trends
- In the PressJanuary 26, 2023
Employee Benefits Post-Dobbs Planning Considerations (Employee Benefit Plan Review)
- Press ReleaseJanuary 19, 2023
Concert Pharmaceuticals Acquired by Sun Pharmaceutical For $576 Million and Contingent Value Rights
- In the PressJanuary 18, 2023
McDonald’s, SEC Saga Creates Reporting Headaches for Companies (Bloomberg Law)
- Press ReleaseDecember 16, 2022
Unanet To Accelerate Growth With Strategic Investment from Onex