Jamie Fleckner is a partner at Goodwin, and is Chair of its ERISA Litigation practice. Ranked Band 1 by Chambers USA in ERISA Litigation, and “among the top ERISA litigators in the country,” Mr. Fleckner represents financial service providers and plan sponsors in class actions, appeals, regulatory investigations, as well as arbitrations regarding the discharge of ERISA duties. He is currently representing some of the country’s largest companies in ERISA litigation, and a wide range of other ERISA litigation challenging the discharge of fiduciary obligations.

Mr. Fleckner regularly litigates class and derivative actions under ERISA, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and related federal and state laws. His practice also focuses on regulatory investigations and governmental proceedings, and has represented clients before the U.S. Department of Labor, Securities and Exchange Commission, Department of Justice, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and state authorities.





Mr. Fleckner represents companies and individual officers in class and derivative actions, regulatory investigations and bankruptcy proceedings regarding the discharge of Investment Company Act, ERISA and other fiduciary duties. His major victories for clients include:

  • Successfully secured denial of a motion to certify a class in a case in which two named plaintiffs alleged that Stadion Money Management, LLC (Stadion) violated certain provisions of ERISA based on its provision of managed account services to certain ERISA retirement plans whose plan sponsors or responsible plan fiduciaries selected Stadion’s service for their individual plans. The case was then voluntarily dismissed. Davis v. Stadion Money Management, LLC, No. 8:19-cv-556, in the District of Nebraska. 
  • Successfully leading the trial team in Wildman v. American Century, 362 F. Supp. 3d 685 (W.D. Mo. 2019) where the Court, after a three week trial, rendered a full defense verdict on all claims that plan fiduciaries violated ERISA by utilizing primarily actively-managed, proprietary mutual funds in the first such case in over a decade to go to full verdict.
  • Successfully obtained dismissal, affirmed on appeal, for the sponsor of one of the nation’s largest retirement plans in an ERISA action challenging the propriety of continued use of company stock despite purportedly under-reserving for the liabilities of insurance subsidiaries by approximately $15 billion. Varga v. General Electric Company, 2020 WL 1064809 (N.D.N.Y. 2020), aff’d, 834 Fed. Appx. 686 (2d Cir. 2021).
  • Successfully obtained dismissal in a novel ERISA class action challenging the procedures used by a leading provider of long-term disability insurance when offsetting social security disability payments. Perry v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., No. 4:19-cv-00106 (M.D. Ga. 2020).
  • Successfully obtained a rare summary judgment ruling in favor of an investment adviser in Redus-Tarchis v. New York Life Investment Management LLC, 2018 WL 5307546 (D.N.J. 2018), in a derivative suit brought under Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 challenging the reasonableness of the fees charged by the investment adviser to four sub-advised mutual funds, with assets totaling over $40 billion.
  • Successfully obtained dismissal, and affirmance on appeal, of one of the first nationwide class action suits to combine claims under ERISA and the Investment Company Act of 1940 for alleged excessive fees involved with proprietary funds utilized on a 401(k) platform. Santomenno v. John Hancock, 768 F.3d 284 (3d Cir. 2014).
  • Successfully obtained dismissal of a putative nationwide class action against one of the nation’s largest retirement recordkeepers in novel ERISA claims concerning the way in which revenue sharing was treated. Malone v. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, 2017 WL 913699 (S.D.N.Y. 2017).
  • Successfully defended a leading multinational bank in ERISA arbitration involving the investment of over $1 billion in a stable value account for the benefit of retirement plan participants. Mr. Fleckner led the defense at arbitration that secured a ruling in the client’s favor on all claims.
Professional Activities

Mr. Fleckner is a member of the Boston and Massachusetts Bar Associations. He serves on the board of the Defined Contribution Institutional Investment Association. In addition to his professional associations, Mr. Fleckner has been involved in numerous community and philanthropic organizations, including as a member of the North American Board of the Union of Reform Judaism, numerous commissions of the Combined Jewish Philanthropies, the Public Policy Committee of the Jewish Community Relations Council and an elected member at the Needham (MA) Town Meeting.

Mr. Fleckner’s pro bono experience includes representing the fiduciary of a retirement plan for teachers in an inner-city charter school to recover misappropriated assets; representing prisoners in a civil rights action; and representing a religious institution in a constitutional challenge to restrictive zoning practices.


Mr. Fleckner has been recognized across the industry. Mr. Fleckner is ranked Band 1 by Chambers USA for ERISA Litigation and has been named a top-ranked partner since 2014. Mr. Fleckner is “a creative and adept litigator, quick on his feet and excellent in the courtroom. He is “consistently terrific to work with. He offers excellent representation in ERISA litigation matters and very well-reasoned, practical guidance to try to avoid potential litigation.” Mr. Fleckner was named by BTI a “Client Service All-Star for 2020.” In 2019, Mr. Fleckner was recognized by Law 360 as an MVP in ERISA Litigation. His success in litigating cutting edge legal issues has been profiled in The American Lawyer’s Big Suits and Litigator of the Week features. Since 2015, he has been recognized as a leading lawyer in the list of Who’s Who Legal: Pensions and Benefits.

In The News









JD, 1998
University of Connecticut School of Law

(magna cum laude)

BA, 1991
Trinity College





U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Profile Image
Get In Touch
Our clients rely on us for world-class advisory services, counsel on complex transactional work and high-stakes litigation. Specializing in matters involving the financial, life sciences, private equity, real estate, and technology industries, we use a collaborative, cross-disciplinary approach to resolve our clients’ most challenging issues. To find out more, please contact us.


Nos équipes interviennent aux côtés de nos clients, industriels, fonds d’investissement, startups, institutions financières et dirigeants, dans le cadre de transactions et de contentieux complexes, et apportent des conseils de tout premier plan dans les secteurs financiers, des Sciences de la Vie, du Private Equity, de l’immobilier et des technologies. Nous traitons les dossiers juridiques de manière intègre, ingénieuse, souple et audacieuse pour répondre efficacement aux enjeux propres à chacun de nos clients, quels que soient la taille de l’opération et le secteur d’activité. Pour en savoir plus, contactez-nous.

Unsere Kunden verlassen sich auf unsere erstklassige Beratung, vor allem im Hinblick auf komplexe Transaktionen und High-Stakes-Prozesse. Spezialisiert auf Angelegenheiten der Finanz-, Life-Sciences-, Private-Equity-, Immobilien-und Technologie-Branchen, verwenden wir einen kooperativen und interdisziplinären Ansatz, um Fragen unserer Kunden auch in extremen Spezialsituationen einer Lösung zuzuführen. Sie wollen mehr erfahren? Kontaktieren Sie uns gerne.

Search Other Lawyers
Recherche par Pratique