In their New York Law Journal Federal Civil Enforcement column, partners William Harrington and Annie Railton discuss 'Azar v. Allina Health Services,' which suggests a new line of attack on the aggressive use of regulatory guidance in FCA cases: challenges not to the appropriateness of looking to guidance documents in a particular action, but to the very validity of the guidance itself. Law clerk Sean Galvin assisted in the preparation of this article. Read the article here.
Press Release
July 08, 2019