Christopher T. Holding

Christopher T. Holding

Partner Co-Chair, Antitrust + Competition
Christopher T. Holding

Christopher Holding is Co-Chair of Goodwin’s Antitrust & Competition practice and a partner in the firm’s Litigation Department. Mr. Holding has particular expertise in issues involving the intersection of antitrust and intellectual property. He has litigated cases in federal and state courts throughout the country and defended federal and state investigations.

Mr. Holding's practice has been deeply immersed in the competition issues at the forefront of the pharmaceutical industry. In addition, he has represented clients on competition issues in industries ranging from health care devices to waste disposal to financial services. Mr. Holding regularly counsels clients on competition issues relating to pricing, including resale price maintenance, minimum advertised price programs, distribution agreements, and Internet pricing. In addition, he routinely advises clients on competition issues with respect to the licensing of IP rights. Mr. Holding’s practice includes litigating competition issues in patent cases, including damages and injunction issues.

Areas of Practice
TÄTIGKEITSFELDER
Domaines D’Expertise
业务范围

Experience

ERFAHRUNG

EXPÉRIENCE

工作经历

Antitrust Litigation

  • In re Intuniv Antitrust Litigation (D.Mass.): Representing Actavis in defense of private antitrust litigation based on claims of “reverse payment” patent settlement.

  • LBE v. BarBri et al. (2d Cir.): Represented bar review provider in case alleging collusion with leading law schools to exclude rival course provider. Obtained dismissal with prejudice; affirmed on appeal.

  • Sergeants Benevolent Ass’n v. Actavis et al. (S.D.N.Y.) (Namenda): Representing Teva in defense of private antitrust litigation based on challenge to patent settlement agreements.

  • FTC v. AbbVie and Teva (E.D.Pa) (Androgel/fenofibrate): Represented Teva in defense of antitrust lawsuit filed by Federal Trade Commission alleging that agreements between AbbVie and Teva settling litigation concerning generic AndroGel and providing Teva supply of fenofibrate constitute a “reverse payment” under the Supreme Court’s 2013 Actavis decision. Won motion to dismiss in district court.

  • In re Aggrenox Antitrust Multidistrict Litigation (D. Conn.): Represented Barr and Teva entities in defense of private antitrust litigation based on claims of “reverse payment” settlement.

  • Abbott v. Teva (D. Del.) (TriCor): Represented Teva as plaintiff in precedent-setting antitrust challenge to the strategic use of life cycle management “product hopping” strategies to delay generic competition. Litigated through trial and settlement.

Patent Litigation

  • GSK v. Teva (D.Del.) (Coreg): Representing Teva in defense of patent infringement and damages claims following “at risk” launch of generic carvedilol. Leading damages defense. Tried case to jury and won JMOL decision setting aside verdict.
  • Otsuka v. Teva (D.N.J.) (Abilify): Defeated TRO, clearing way for Teva and other generic companies to launch generic aripiprazole.

  • Wyeth v. Teva (D.N.J.) (Protonix): Represented Teva in defense of patent infringement and damages claims following “at risk” launch of generic pantoprazole. Tried damages case to jury prior to settlement.

  • In re Rituxumab Patent Litigation (D.N.J.): Represented Teva and Celltrion in defense of patent litigation about biosimilar product. Led defense of irreparable harm issues for PI prior to settlement.

Licensing Disputes

  • Shionogi v. Andrx et al. (N.Y.Sup.Ct.) (Fortamet): Representing Actavis as defendant in litigation seeking injunctive relief and damages in connection with a license and supply agreement concerning Fortamet.
  • Teva v. Shire (S.D.N.Y.) (Adderall XR): Represented Teva as plaintiff in litigation seeking injunctive relief and specific performance in connection with supply agreement between Teva and Shire concerning generic Adderall XR. Also represented Teva as intervenor in subsequent related litigation instituted by Impax against Shire.

FDA Litigation & Regulatory Matters

  • Apotex v. Alcon (S.D. Ind.) (Olopatadine): Represented Barr as intervenor-defendant in declaratory judgment action by Apotex seeking to force a forfeiture of Barr’s first-filer exclusivity. Won dismissal of action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, allowing Barr to launch product with exclusivity.
  • Otsuka v. FDA (D.Md.) (Abilify): Represented Teva as intervenor-defendant in litigation challenging FDA’s decision that Otsuka’s pediatric exclusivity did not block approval of ANDAs for generic aripiprazole. Successfully defeated TRO and won summary judgment.

Amicus Briefs for Generic Pharmaceuticals Association

  • FTC v. Actavis (Supreme Court): Filed certiorari and merits briefs arguing against use of per se or “quick look” standards for evaluating patent settlement agreements.
  • In re Wellbutrin Antitrust Litigation (Third Circuit): Filed brief addressing legal and evidentiary standards for causation and antitrust injury in private actions challenging settlement agreements.
Professional Activities

Mr. Holding is a member of the American and Boston Bar Associations. He currently serves as a trustee of the Episcopal Divinity School at Union Theological Seminary in New York.

Professional Experience

From October 1998 through April 1999, he served as a special assistant district attorney in the Middlesex County (MA) District Attorney’s Office, where he prosecuted crimes and successfully litigated several jury trials.

Recognition

Mr. Holding has been consistently recognized in Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business, where clients have described him as "a big-picture thinker and a fantastic advocate." Mr. Holding has also been recognized by The Legal 500 United States, Benchmark Litigation, and Global Competition Review’s GCR 100.

In The News

MELDUNGEN

ACTUALITÉS

相关新闻

Credentials

WERDEGANG

RÉFÉRENCES

专业资格

Education

J.D., 1994
Harvard Law School

(magna cum laude)

B.A., 1988
Princeton University

(summa cum laude)

Clerkships

1994 to 1995 Connecticut Supreme Court, Honorable Ellen A. Peters

Admissions

Bar

Massachusetts
Connecticut

Courts

U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
U.S. District Court of Connecticut
Get In Touch
Kontakt
NOUS CONTACTER
联系我们
Our clients rely on us for world-class advisory services, counsel on complex transactional work and high-stakes litigation. Specializing in matters involving the financial, life sciences, private equity, real estate, and technology industries, we use a collaborative, cross-disciplinary approach to resolve our clients’ most challenging issues. To find out more, please contact us.

Unsere Kunden verlassen sich auf unsere erstklassige Beratung, vor allem im Hinblick auf komplexe Transaktionen und High-Stakes-Prozesse. Spezialisiert auf Angelegenheiten der Finanz-, Life-Sciences-, Private-Equity-, Immobilien-und Technologie-Branchen, verwenden wir einen kooperativen und interdisziplinären Ansatz, um Fragen unserer Kunden auch in extremen Spezialsituationen einer Lösung zuzuführen. Sie wollen mehr erfahren? Kontaktieren Sie uns gerne.

Nos équipes interviennent aux côtés de nos clients, industriels, fonds d’investissement, startups, institutions financières et dirigeants, dans le cadre de transactions et de contentieux complexes, et apportent des conseils de tout premier plan dans les secteurs financiers, des Sciences de la Vie, du Private Equity, de l’immobilier et des technologies. Nous traitons les dossiers juridiques de manière intègre, ingénieuse, souple et audacieuse pour répondre efficacement aux enjeux propres à chacun de nos clients, quels que soient la taille de l’opération et le secteur d’activité. Pour en savoir plus, contactez-nous.

客户信赖我们世界一流的咨询服务,希望获得针对复杂事务性工作与高风险诉讼的建议。我们通过协作式、跨领域的工作方法来解决客户最棘手的问题,涵盖金融、生命科学、私募股权、不动产和技术等多个行业。如需更多信息,请与我们联系。

Search Other Lawyers
ANWALTSSUCHE
Recherche par Pratique
搜寻其他律师